When a prominent star in the night sky suddenly dims, it generates a lot of interest. That’s what happened with the red supergiant star Betelgeuse between November 2019 and May 2020. Betelgeuse will eventually explode as a supernova. Was the dimming a signal that the explosion was imminent?
No, and new research helps explain why.
Headline writers couldn’t resist the supernova angle, even though that explanation was never very likely. Eventually, it became clear that ejected dust from the star caused the dimming. New research based on observations before, during, and after the Great Dimming Event (GDE) supports the idea that dust from the star itself caused Betelgeuse’s drop in brightness.
A research letter titled “Images of Betelgeuse with VLTI/MATISSE across the Great Dimming” presents the infrared observations of Betelgeuse. The observations capture the star before, during, and after the GDE. The lead author is Julien Drevon, from the Université Côte d’Azur, France, and the European Southern University.
“To better understand the dimming event, we used mid-infrared long-baseline spectro-interferometric measurements of Betelgeuse taken with the VLTI/MATISSE instrument before (Dec. 2018), during (Feb. 2020) and after (Dec. 2020) the GDE,” the research letter states. In particular, their observations focus on silicon monoxide (SiO.)
The authors of the new research outline three steps in the process that created the GDE.
Step OneThe GDE started with shocks deep inside Betelgeuse. They generated a convective outflow of plasma that brought material to the star’s surface. Researchers detected a strong shock in February 2018 and a weaker one in January 2019. The second, weaker shock boosted the effect of the stronger shock that preceded it, generating a progressive plasma flow at the surface of Betelgeuse’s photosphere.
Step TwoThe plasma flowing to the photosphere’s surface created a hot spot. Hubble UV observations of Betelgeuse revealed the presence of a luminous, hot, dense structure in the star’s southern hemisphere, between the photosphere and the chromosphere.
Step ThreeStellar material detaches from the photosphere and forms a gas cloud above Betelgeuse’s surface. A colder region forms under this cloud as a dark spot. Since it’s cooler, dust is allowed to condense above this region and in the part of the cloud above it. That dust is what blocked some of Betelgeuse’s luminosity, causing the GDE.
Previous research revealed this three-step process behind the GDE. The authors of the new research article set out to observe Betelgeuse’s close circumstellar environment to probe and monitor its geometry. In the wavelength range they worked in, SiO spectral features are prominent, and they’re used to understand what happened with the red supergiant. In astronomy, SiO is used as a tracer for shocked gas in stellar outflows since it persists at high temperatures.
This figure from the research letter shows some of the data the researchers worked with. The top panel shows the absolute spectra during each observed epoch. The bottom panel shows the relative flux for the SiO bands. The bands are deeper during the GDE than either before or after. Image Credit: J. Drevon et al. 2024.In their article, the authors focus on the SiO (2-0) band and what it signifies. They note how the band’s intensity contrast increases by 14% during the GDE. “Therefore, it seems that during the GDE, we observe brighter structures in the line of sight,” they explain.
Next, they note a 50% decrease in intensity contrast in December 2020. What does it mean?
“The SiO (2–0) opacity depth map shows, therefore, strong temporal variations within 2 years, indicative of vigorous changes in the star’s environment in this time span,” they write.
Their observations also suggest “the presence of an infrared excess in the pseudo continuum during the GDE, which has been interpreted as new hot dust formed,” Drevon and his colleagues write.
This figure from the research article explains some of what the researchers found. The middle column is particularly interesting because it’s a reconstruction of the SiO (2-0) absorption band onto Betelgeuse’s surface for each of the three observed epochs. The third column is similar but shows the SiO (2-0) optical depth. Overall, they constrain the geometry of the dust feature that caused the GDE. Image Credit: J. Drevon et al. 2024.It seems like the Great Dimming is no longer the mystery it once was. It also shows that Occam’s Razor is alive and well: “The explanation that requires the fewest assumptions is usually correct.”
The supernova proposal was fun for a while, and one day, Betelgeuse will explode as a supernova. But before it ever does, there are likely going to be several more episodes of dimming. For now, the authors say that the star is returning to normal.
“The Dec. 2020 observations suggest that Betelgeuse seems to be returning to a gas and surface environment similar to the one observed in Dec. 2018,” they write, “but with smoother structures, maybe
due to the unusual amount of dust recently formed during the GDE in the line of sight.”
Case closed?
The post Betelgeuse. Before, During and After the Great Dimming appeared first on Universe Today.
The Free Press has a new 20-minute film called “American miseducation”, centered on pro-Palestinian protests on American campuses. Given the pro-Israeli stand of that site, the tenor of this film is not surprising: its thesis is that aggressive pro-Palestinian demonstrators are not just anti-Zionist, but largely antisemitic, and on some campuses are intimidating and even attacking Jewish students, who have no “safe space” of their own. (The attack on the Cooper Union library, shown in this film, is an example.)
The film is made by Olivia Reingold, a Free Press staff writer whose bona fides are these:
Olivia Reingold co-created and executive produced Matthew Yglesias’s podcast, “Bad Takes.” She got her start in public radio, regularly appearing on NPR for her reporting on indigenous communities in Montana. She previously produced podcasts at POLITICO, where she shaped conversations with world leaders like Jens Stoltenberg.
And this is her intro to the film:
That was one of 14 pro-Palestinian rallies I’ve attended since Hamas attacked Israel on October 7. Like the Rockefeller Christmas tree, the activists behind these events consider innocuous institutions to be their enemies: Memorial Sloan Kettering’s Cancer Center, the American Museum of Natural History, and the U.S. Holocaust Museum.
They insist that their aim is to liberate Palestinians, and that they are not antisemitic. But attend enough of these demonstrations and you’ll start to see the swastikas. Some people have looked me in the eyes and said that Israelis are the new Nazis, the prime minister of Israel is the new Hitler, and Palestinians are the new Jews. Out of the scores of people I’ve spoken to, only two demonstrators told me that Israel has a right to exist.
The word Jew is rarely uttered by these protesters. Instead, people hurl terms like Zionist, settler-colonialist, and occupier. They speak of academic theories like decolonization and intersectionality—concepts many told me they learned at elite institutions like Columbia and the University of Pennsylvania.
I decided to go to the source of these ideas: The American campus, where I spoke to scores of anti-Israel activists and dozens of Jewish college students across the country.
I asked: How did an ideology once restricted to the ivory tower come to inspire masses of Americans chanting on behalf of Hamas and Yemeni Houthis? How did Gen Z, the most educated generation in U.S. history, become sympathetic to terrorism? And, most fundamentally, how did our colleges come to abandon the pursuit of truth in pursuit of something far darker?
The result is The Free Press’s first-ever documentary, American Miseducation.
The questions she asks in her last paragraph aren’t really answered, although Critical Theory seems to be a good solution: the oppressor-narrative combined with some undercover anti-Semitism. But the movie poses its own questions. Is there really a difference between antisemitism and anti-Zionism? Should antisemitic or anti-Palestinian speech be deemed hate speech? Who is being most targeted by campus demonstrations: the pro-Israeli or pro-Palestinian students? (I’ve seen both groups claim that they are being oppressed.) My sympathies have been made clear on this site, but I’ll withhold them for now, for you should just watch this short movie.
After seeing this movie, Malgorzata told me glumly. “The good life for American Jews is coming to an end. . . . they are now more or less in the same situation that German Jews were in after Hitler came to power in 1933. The antisemitism started slowly, but then grew over time until it became too late escape.” As to what kind of anti-semitism will grow in America, she said, that cannot be predicted.