Who knew that magnetic fields could be so useful?
Everything in the Universe spins. Galaxies, planets, stars, and black holes all rotate, even if just a bit. It comes from the fact that the clouds of scattered gas and dust of the cosmos are never perfectly symmetrical. But the Universe as a whole does not rotate. Some objects spin one way, some another, but add them all up, and the total rotation is zero. At least that's what we've thought. But a new study suggests that the Universe does rotate, and this rotation solves the big mystery of cosmology known as the Hubble tension.
Today we have the birds of British Columbia by reader Paul Handford. His captions and IDs are indented, and you can enlarge his photos by clicking on them,
I suspect that “endless mountains and forests” come to mind for many when envisioning what British Columbia, in Canada’s far west, but, as well as those dominant aspects of BC’s landscape, the south-central portion of the province, between the Coast and Rocky mountain ranges, is pretty dry, given that it sits in the rain-shadow caused by the Coast Ranges that capture much of the moisture from the moist air-masses that roll in off the Pacific Ocean.
Accordingly, this part of BC supports a mix of dry grassland and sagebrush at lower elevations— much of it along the river valleys— with woodlands and forest higher up. So it’s a diverse region, and very beautiful— as is all of BC.
These pics are from around our home in the hills on the outskirts of Kamloops, and the surrounding area.
Bohemian waxwing, Bombycilla garrulus. S. Thompson river valley:
Lazuli bunting, Passerina amoena. Valleyview trails:
Western tanager, Piranga ludoviciana. Barnhartvale:
Clark’s nutcracker, Nucifraga columbiana. Barnharvale:
Common Raven, Corvus corax. Dallas-Barnhartvale Nature Park:
Steller’s jay, Cyanocitta stelleri:
Chipping sparrow, Spizella passerina:
Dark-eyed Junco, Junco hyemalis:
Vesper sparrow, Pooecetes gramineus:
Pine grosbeak, Pinicola enucleator:
Red crossbill, Loxia curvirostra:
Tree swallow, Tachycineta bicolor:
As the US government freezes scientific funding and attacks my host institution (under the pretense of fighting anti-semitism — a claim no one here believes, given that the government is now doing far more actual harm to Harvard’s not-so-small population of Jewish faculty, researchers and students than was ever done by anti-Gaza-war protestors), it has become impossible to continue with my normal activities. I hope to resume them in the future.
Exoplanets are pretty exciting – in the last few decades we have gone from knowing absolutely nothing about planets beyond our solar system to having a catalogue of over 5,000 confirmed exoplanets. That’s still a small sample considering there are likely between 100 billion and 1 trillion planets in the Milky Way. It is also not a random sample, but is biased by our detection methods, which favor larger planets closer to their parent stars. Still, some patterns are starting to emerge. One frustrating pattern is the lack of any worlds that are close duplicates of Earth – an Earth mass exoplanet in the habitable zone of a yellow star (I’d even take an orange star).
Life, however, does not require an Earth-like planet. Anything in the habitable zone, defined as potentially having a temperature allowing for liquid water on its surface, will do. The habitable zone also depends on variables such as the atmosphere of the planet. Mars could be warm if it had a thicker atmosphere, and Venus could be habitable if it had less of one. Cataloguing exoplanets gives us the ability to address a burning scientific question – how common is life in the universe? We have yet to add any data points of clear examples of life beyond Earth. So far we have one example of life in the universe, which means we can’t calculate how common it is (except maybe setting some statistical upper limits).
Finding that a planet is habitable and therefore could potentially support life is not enough. We need evidence that there is actually life there. For this the hunt for exoplanets includes looking for potential biosignatures – signs of life. We may have just found the first biosignatures on an exoplanet. This is not 100%. We need more data. But it is pretty intriguing.
The planet is K2-18b, a sub-Neptune orbiting a red dwarf 120 light years from Earth. In terms of exoplanet size, we have terrestrial planets like Earth and the rocky inner planets of our solar system. Then there are super-Earths, larger than Earth up to about 2 earth masses, still likely rocky worlds. Sub Neptunes are larger still, but still smaller than Neptune. They likely have rocky surfaces and thick atmospheres. K2-18b has a radius 2.6 times that of Earth, with a mass 8.6 times that of Earth. The surface gravity is estimated at 12.43 m/s^2 (compared to 9.8 on Earth). We could theoretically land a rocket and take off again from its surface.
K2-18 is a red dwarf, which means it has a habitable zone close in. K2-18b orbits every 33 days, and had an eccentric orbit but staying within the habitable zone. This means it is likely tidally locked, but may be in a resonance orbit (like Mercury), meaning that it rotates three times for every two orbits, or something like that. Fortunately for astronomers, K2-18b orbits in front of its star from our perspective on Earth. This is how it was detected, but also this means we can potentially examine the chemical makeup of its atmosphere with spectroscopy. When the planet passes in front of its star we can look at the absorption lines of the light passing through it to detect the signatures of different chemicals. Using this technique with the Hubble astronomers have found methane and carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. They have also found dimethyl sulfide and a similar molecule called dimethyl disulfide. On Earth the only known source of dimethyl sulfide is living organisms, specifically algae. This molecule is also highly reactive and therefore short-lived, which means if it is present in the atmosphere it is being constantly renewed. Follow up observations with the Webb confirmed the presence of dimethyl sulfide, in concentrations 20 times higher than on Earth.
What does this mean? Well, it could mean that K2-18b has a surface ocean that is brimming with life. This fits with one model of sub-Neptunes, called the Hycean model, which means they can have large surface oceans and an atmosphere with lots of hydrogen. These are conditions suitable for life. But this is not the only possibility.
One of the problems with chemical biosignatures is that they frustratingly all have abiotic sources. Oxygen can occur through the splitting of water or CO2 by ultraviolet light, and by reactions with quartz. Methane also has geological sources. What about dimethyl sulfide? Well, it has been found in cometary matter with a likely abiotic source. So there may be some geological process on K2-18b pumping out dimethyl sulfide. Or there may be an ocean brimming with marine life creating the stuff. We need to do more investigation of K2-18b to understand more about its likely surface conditions, atmosphere, and prospects for life.
This, unfortunately, is how these things are likely to go – we find a potential biosignature that also has abiotic explanations and then we need years of follow up investigation. Most of the time the biosignatures don’t pan out (like on Venus and Mars so far). It’s a setup for disappointment. But eventually we may go all the way through this process and make a solid case for life on an exoplanet. Then finally we will have our second data point, and have a much better idea of how common life is likely to be in our universe.
The post Possible Biosignature on K2-18b first appeared on NeuroLogica Blog.
When science was under attack, Dr. John Ioannidis played the role of enabler. Along with his copious COVID misinformation, that will be his permanent legacy.
The post Tell us Dr. John Ioannidis, Exactly Who is Waging This “War on Science”? first appeared on Science-Based Medicine.Gamma-ray bursts are the most powerful events in the Universe, briefly outshining the combined light of their entire galaxies. A team of astronomers has figured out a clever technique to use the light from gamma-ray bursts to map out the large-scale structure of the Universe at different ages after the Big Bang. They found that the Universe might be less uniform at large scales than previously thought.