News Feeds

There are many ways in which our brains can be hacked. It is a complex overlapping set of algorithms evolved to help us interact with our environment to enhance survival and reproduction. However, while we evolved in the natural world, we now live in a world of technology, which gives us the ability to control our environment. We no longer have to simply adapt to the environment, we can adapt the environment to us. This partly means that we can alter the environment to “hack” our adaptive algorithms. Now we have artificial intelligence (AI) that has become a very powerful tool to hack those brain pathways.

In the last decade chatbots have blown past the Turing Test – which is a type of test in which a blinded evaluator has to tell the difference between a live person and an AI through conversation alone. We appear to still be on the steep part of the curve in terms of improvements in these large language model and other forms of AI. What these applications have gotten very good at is mimicking human speech – including pauses, inflections, sighing, “ums”, and all the other imperfections that make speech sound genuinely human.

As an aside, these advances have rendered many sci-fi vision of the future quaint and obsolete. In Star Trek, for example, even a couple hundred years in the future computers still sounded stilted and artificial. We could, however, retcon this choice to argue that the stilted computer voices of the sci-fi future were deliberate, and not a limitation of the technology. Why would they do this? Well…

Current AI is already so good at mimicking human speech, including the underlying human emotion, that people are forming emotional attachments to them, or being emotionally manipulated by them. People are, literally, falling in love with their chatbots. You might argue that they just “think” they are falling in love, or they are pretending to fall in love, but I see no reason not to take them at their word. I’m also not sure there is a meaningful difference between thinking one has fallen in love and actually falling in love – the same brain circuits, neurotransmitters, and feelings are involved.

Researchers generally consider there are three neurological components to falling in love (lust, romance, attachment). There is sexual attraction and lust, mediated by estrogen and testosterone. There is the romantic feeling of being in love mediated by dopamine, serotonin and norepinephrine. During sex and other forms of physical intimacy endorphins are released which make us feel happy, and also oxytocin which is associated with feelings of attachment. Vasopressin is also involved, linked also to long term attachment and feelings of protectiveness. Do we experience the same biochemical reactions to interacting with AI? The data so far says yes.

In fact, this data goes back far before AI. Psychologists and neurologists have know for a long time that people can form emotional attachments to inanimate objects (objectophilia). This it the teddy bear phenomenon – even as young children we can form an attachment to an object and treat it as if it were a living thing, even if we know objectively it isn’t. This likely has to do with the cues that our brains use to divide up the world. We mentally categorize objects as either agents (things able to act on their own) and non-agents. For some reason we evolved algorithms to determine this that are not dependent on whether or not the object is actually alive, but simply if it moves and acts as if it is alive. If something acts like an agent, or even looks like an agent, our brains categorize them that way and link them to our emotional centers, so we feel things about them.

As one researcher put it – AI is a teddy bear on steroids. Chatbots are designed to act human, to push our buttons and make us feel as if they are agents, and therefore activate all the the circuitry involved with how we feel about things our brain treats as agents. Not only that, but chatbots can be programmed to be friendly, available, a “good listener”, accommodating, and flattering. Some of these traits may be inadvertently (or deliberately, depending upon how cynical you’re feeling) triggering of romantic feelings. There are, of course, apps that deliberately design AI chatbots to be sexual and romantic (come meet your new AI girlfriend), complete with alluring AI generated imagery, all custom-made, if you wish.

So yes, people can really fall in love with an AI. Why not? That fits with everything we know about psychology and how our brains work. It is an extreme example of us adapting our environment to hack our own adaptive circuitry, to engineer feedback to maximally stimulate our reward circuitry. There are many ways in which we do this – porn, recreational drugs, roller coasters, gambling, ridiculously delicious foods. This can be harmless and fun, adding a little spice to our life, but pretty much every manifestation of hacking our reward circuitry is also associated with what we generally categorize as “addiction”. Addiction is one of those things that is hard to operationally define, because it is such a multifaceted spectrum, but in generally something is considered an addiction when it becomes a net negative for your life. Addictions cause dysfunction in some way.

Can someone be “addicted” to their chatbot, whether the relationship is platonic or romantic? It seems so. But even short of an addiction, is it a good idea to spend a significant amount of time in an artificial relationship that mimics a human relationship, but is crafted to give you all the power and to be maximally flattering without demanding anything of you? Some psychologists are raising the alarm bells, worrying about a spoiler effect. Such AI relationship can potentially spoil us for relationships with living humans, who have their own wants, desires, flaws, and demands. Relationships are work – but why do all that work when you can have a submissive mate that is perfectly happy making the relationship entirely about you? Of course, there is the physical intimacy part, but there are partial ways around that as well. This does, however, raise the question about how important physical intimacy is compared to emotional intimacy. I suspect there is a lot of individual variation here.

Again, we seem to be running a massive social experiment with some very real concerns. This also does get me back to the sci-fi retcon – perhaps it would be better for chatbots to not be too human. They can still fulfil their functions (other, of course, than being a romantic companion or similar) if they had an affect that was obviously artificial. This is a form of transparency – you know when you are talking to an AI because they talk like an AI, and they interact in a way that is designed to be functional but specifically not provoke any emotions, or pretend to have emotions themselves. I suspect this would be a good thing for society, but also that nothing like this will happen on its own.

The post Falling In Love With AI first appeared on NeuroLogica Blog.

A newly identified planet candidate, HD 137010 b, looks strikingly Earth-like in size and orbit — but it may be colder than Mars due to its dimmer star. If it has a thick enough atmosphere, though, this icy world could still surprise us.

Scientists studying a rock sample collected by NASA’s Curiosity rover have uncovered something tantalizing: the largest organic molecules ever detected on Mars. The compounds — decane, undecane, and dodecane — may be fragments of fatty acids, which on Earth are most often linked to life. While non-living processes like meteorite impacts can also create such molecules, researchers found those sources couldn’t fully explain the amounts detected.

Anti-science health legislation doesn't just reflect misinformation; it institutionalizes it, cementing false beliefs into population-level risks.

The post 2026: State Legislatures as Vectors of Health Misinformation and Anti-Science first appeared on Science-Based Medicine.

DOI: arXiv:2602.04840 | arXiv:2602.04840v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The EXoplanet Climate Infrared TElescope (EXCITE) is a balloon-borne mission dedicated to measuring spectroscopic phase curves of hot Jupiter-type exoplanets. Phase curve measurements can be used to characterize an exoplanet's longitude-dependent atmospheric composition and energy circulation patterns. EXCITE carries a 0.5 m primary mirror and moderate resolution diffraction-limited spectrograph with spectral coverage from 0.8--3.5 um. EXCITE is...

The idea of self-amplifying gene editing is to get cells to pass on packages of CRISPR machinery to their neighbours, boosting the effect

A fleet of wind-propelled robot boats could act as a sensor network covering a wide area and relay acoustic signals to a submarine

Deep inside a nearby galaxy cloaked in thick clouds of gas and dust, astronomers have uncovered a surprising treasure trove of organic molecules using the James Webb Space Telescope. Peering through the cosmic veil in infrared light, researchers detected an extraordinary mix of carbon-rich compounds — including benzene, methane, and even the highly reactive methyl radical, never before seen outside the Milky Way.

NASA’s Magellan Mission to Venus is the gift the keeps on giving, providing Italian researchers with the first solid detection of a massive subsurface lava tube on Venus. They detail their findings in a new paper appearing in the journal Nature Communications.

The commercial space giant SpaceX, which Elon Musk founded in 2002 to build a self-sustaining city on Mars, is no longer focusing on the Red Planet. According to a recent statement on X, SpaceX is now pivoting to the Moon as its intended destination for a human settlement.

Many researchers thought that earthquakes in the Himalayas recur at regular intervals – but an analysis of sediment cores has shown they are largely random, and the region has seen far more than we previously realised

The Chincha Kingdom was transporting seabird excrement from islands to valleys as early as the 13th century, and this powerful fertiliser may have been key to its economic success

We must find a balance between haste and getting mired in medical inertia

There are huge benefits to ringing the changes when it comes to exercise, finds committed runner Grace Wade when she analyses the science

In George Saunders's Vigil, a ghost visits Earth to help a dying oil tycoon, while terraforming efforts on Mars are about to bear fruit in The Rainseekers by Matthew Kressel. Emily H. Wilson's sci-fi column explores two very different short novels

The books, TV, games and more that New Scientist staff have enjoyed this week

It's hard not to despair about the state of the world today, but here are five reasons to be a little bit hopeful, says Fred Pearce

We are told we need cynical strategies to "play" the dating game, but the science says this is totally wrong. David Robson enjoys an evidence-based takedown from psychologist Paul Eastwick

Feedback is always on the lookout for better ways to measure things, and was delighted to learn how the weight of ice is quantified in Austin, Texas

I missed this Bill Maher “New Rules” clip from last October, but better late than never.  In this segment called “Crazy in gov,” Maher assesses whether Democrats or Republicans are more deranged,  Although he does point out some craziness on the part of “progressives,” but it is the Republicans who get the Most Deranged prize. So much for people who think Maher is right. He’s a classical liberal, for crying out loud!

I feel sorry for press secretary Karoline Leavitt, forced to mouth ardent defenses of Trump, but on the other hand maybe she actually believes the pablum she regurgitates.

Maher’s guests here are Michael Steele, co-host of MNBC Weeknight, and CNN political analyst Kate Bedingfield, who was former White House director of communications under Biden.