Today we have some lovely bird pictures by reader Paul Handford. Paul’s captions and IDs are indented, and you can enlarge the photos by clicking on them.
A few words about me. I am an evolutionary biologist, retired since 2010. I grew up in UK, did my doctorate in E.B. Ford’s group, then to Rockefeller U, NYC, for post-doc (on possible genetic correlates of vocal dialects in the Rufous-collared sparrow, Zonotrichia capensis, in n.w. Argentina), then to Canada, home of my main career, on faculty at Western University Biology Dept, in London, Ontario. After a decade or so post-retirement living in British Columbia, we moved definitively to Ireland.
This these are all passerine birds from Ireland, mostly from the general Dublin area, taken in the past 2-3 years.
Male Chaffinch, Fringilla coelebs. Drumcondra, Dublin, Mar, 2023:
European Goldfinch, Carduelis carduelis. Kilmainham, Dublin. Mar, 2022:
Grey Wagtail, Motacilla cinerea. River Tolka, Drumcondra. Feb 2023:
European Robin, Erithacus rubecula. Castletown, Celbridge, Dec 2021:
Eurasian Blackbird, Turdus merula. Drumcondra, Feb, 2023:
Song Thrush, Turdus philomelos, River Dodder, Dublin. Jan, 2022:
These shots are essentially portrait shots, so little to say about behaviour etc. (except the singing robin!)
More shots from around Dublin. You might be surprised to see the humble and much-maligned starling here; but though ubiquitous and pushy, close inspection shows them to be quite beautiful, and they are remarkable vocal mimics, with a highly complex song.
Eurasian Skylark, Alauda arvensis. Bull Island, Dublin Bay. Mar 2022:
White-throated Dipper, Cinclus cinclus. River Dodder. Apr 2023:
Eurasian Blue Tit, Cyanistes caeruleus. Drumcondra. Feb 2022:
Great Tit, Parus major. River Liffey, Kilmainham. Feb 2022:
European Starling, Sturnus vulgaris. Bull Island. Apr 2022:
Eurasian wren, Troglodytes troglodytes. River Dodder. Apr 2023:
Camera: Canon EOS 90D; lens: Canon EF 100-400mm 1:4.5-5.6 L IS II USM
Last time, I showed you that a simple quantum system, consisting of a single particle in a superposition of traveling from the left OR from the right, leads to a striking quantum interference effect. It can then produce the same kind of result as the famous double-slit experiment.
The pre-quantum version of this system, in which (like a 19th century scientist) I draw the particle as though it actually has a definite position and motion in each half of the superposition, looks like Fig. 1. The interference occurs when the particle in both halves of the superposition reaches the point at center, x=0.
Figure 1: A case where interference does occur.Then I posed a puzzle. I put a system of two [distinguishable] particles into a superposition which, in pre-quantum language, looks like Fig. 2.
Figure 2: Two particles in a superposition of both particles moving right (starting from left of center) or both moving left (from right of center.) Their speeds are equal.with all particles traveling at the same speed and passing each other without incident if they meet. And I pointed out three events that would happen in quick succession, shown in Figs. 2a-2c.
Figure 2.1: Event 1 at x=0. Figure 2.2: Event 2a at x=+1 and event 2b at x=-1. Figure 2.3: Event 3 at x=0.And I asked the Big Question: in the quantum version of Fig. 2, when will we see quantum interference?
So? Well? What’s the correct answer?
The correct answer is … 6. No interference occurs — not in any of the three events in Figs. 2.1-2.3, or at any other time.
How, indeed?
Perhaps thinking of the particle as interfering with itself is . . . problematic.
Perhaps imagining individual particles interfering with themselves might not be sufficient to capture the range of quantum phenomena. Perhaps we will need to focus more on systems of particles, not individual particles — or more generally, to consider physical systems as a whole, and not necessarily in parts.
Intuition From Other ExamplesTo start to gain some intuition, consider some other examples. Some have interference, some do not. What distinguishes one class from the other?
For example, the case of Fig. 4 looks almost like Fig. 2, except that the two particles in the bottom part of the superposition are switched. Is there interference in this case?
Figure 4: Similar to Fig. 2, but with the twoparticles reversed in the bottom part of the superposition.Yes.
How about Fig. 5. In this case, the orange particle is stationary in both parts of the superposition. Is there interference?
Figure 5: In this case, the blue particle is moving (horizontal arrow), but the orange one is stationary in both cases (vertical arrow).Yes, there is.
And Fig. 6? Again the orange particle is stationary in either part of the superposition.
Figure 6: Similar to Fig. 5, in that the orange particle is again stationary.No interference this time.
What about Fig. 7 and Fig. 8?
Figure 7: Now the particles in each part of the superposition move in opposite directions. Figure 8: As in Fig. 7, but with the two particles switched in the bottom part of the superposition.Yes, interference in both cases. And Figs. 9 and 10?
Figure 9: The blue particle is stationary in both parts of the superposition. Figure 10: Similar to Fig. 9, except that now the orange particle is stationary in the bottom part of the superposition.There is interference in the example of Fig. 10, but not that of Fig. 9.
To understand the twists and turns of the double-slit experiment and its many variants, one must be crystal clear about why the above examples do or do not generate interference. We’ll spend several posts exploring them.
What’s Happening (and Where)?Let’s focus on the cases where interference does occur: Figs. 1, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 10. First, can you identify what they have in common that the cases without interference (Figs. 2, 6 and 9) lack? And second — bringing back the bonus question from last time, which now comes to the fore — in the cases that show interference, exactly when does it happen, and how can we observe it?
Next time we will start the process of going through the examples in Fig. 2 and Figs. 4-10, to see in each case
From what we learn, we will try to extract some deep lessons.
If you are truly motivated to understand our quantum world, I promise you that this tour of basic quantum phenomena will be well worth your time.
As of five minutes ago. But last night we had bad storms in Chicago and now it’s snowing. I hope the ducks are okay. Esther looks to have motherhood in her future.
Why the value of placebo controls is not an affirmation of a powerful placebo effect
The post The use of placebo controls in clinical trials first appeared on Science-Based Medicine.As civilisations become more and more advanced, their power needs also increase. It’s likely that an advanced civilisation might need so much power that they enclose their host star in solar energy collecting satellites. These Dyson Swarms will trap heat so any planets within the sphere are likely to experience a temperature increase. A new paper explores this and concludes that a complete Dyson swarm outside the orbit of the Earth would raise our temperature by 140 K!
We know that regular supernovae pose no existential threat to life on Earth in the near-term. But there are other varieties of supernova that are a little bit harder to predict, and little bit harder to spot.
Dark Energy is a mystery so daunting that it stretches and strains our most robust theories. The Universe is expanding, driven by the unknown force that we've named Dark Energy. Dark Energy is also accelerating the rate of expansion. If scientists could figure out why, it would open up a whole new avenue of understanding.
The ESA's Euclid Space Telescope has already wowed us with some fantastic images. After launching in July 2023, the telescope delivered some stunning first images of the Perseus Cluster, the Horsehead Nebula, and other astronomical objects. Now, the telescope has released its first images of its three Deep Fields.